Skip to main content

The Science of Dark Humour | Hri-write

I'd like to begin by saying this blog isn't meant to offend anyone. It's all for the sake of fun and entertainment, and to satisfy my sadistic desideratum. If you're easily offended, or if this blog offended you in any way, it's because it was meant to.

(If that last line offended you, get out right now. It's going to get much worse.)



It might be worthwhile to address the question of 'why we laugh' before dealing with comedy styles such as dark humour.
We believe laughter evolved from the panting behavior of our ancient primate ancestors. Today, if we tickle chimps or gorillas, they don’t laugh “ha ha ha” but exhibit a panting sound. That’s the sound of ape laughter. And it’s the root of human laughter. Apes laugh in conditions in which human laughter is produced, like tickle, rough and tumble play, and chasing games. Other animals produce vocalizations during play, but they are so different that it’s difficult to equate them with laughter. Rats, for e…

Where is all the 'alien life?' - Fermi Paradox and other theories

My first blog, ever, was about understanding the odds of alien life. I've gotten much better at writing blogs since then (or so I like to tell myself), and it would only be right if I reinstate the legacy of that one.


We should openly admit that when we happen to be under a starry night and see a sight similar to this, we all have a react in a different and interesting way. Some people are left boggled by the immense size of the universe, others by the sheer glamour of the scene and if you're anything like me, you're paralysed by the sudden realisation that you have a negligible impact on the universe. The point is, we all feel something.

When he looked up at the sky, Italian physicist Enrico Fermi too felt something, a thought that lingered around this question, "Where is everyone else?" It's been half a decade since Fermi passed on, but he left us with a fundamental query and idea.

Fermi realised that in a universe as old and vast as this, there should be plentiful planets that harbour life, and so he immediately realised that there should also have been more than enough time for aliens to have developed sufficient technology to travel the galaxy. However, they don't seem to be zooming past us and visiting us.
"This sounds a bit silly at first. The fact that aliens don't seem to be walking our planet apparently implies that there are no extraterrestrials anywhere among the vast tracts of the Galaxy. Many researchers consider this to be a radical conclusion to draw from such a simple observation. Surely there is a straightforward explanation for what has become known as the Fermi Paradox. There must be some way to account for our apparent loneliness in a galaxy that we assume is filled with other clever beings." - SETI.

SETI (The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) is a global, unanimous community which encompasses all work done to seek extraterrestrial life. Any and all people that dedicate their work of astronomy to seeking out extra terrestrial life are the at the crux of SETI.

The Fermi Paradox

"The Fermi Paradox seeks to answer the question of where the aliens are. Given that our star and Earth are part of a young planetary system compared to the rest of the universe — and that interstellar travel might be fairly easy to achieve — the theory says that Earth should have been visited by aliens already."

It is already known that the entire universe is gigantic and ancient. The estimations that the universe is 92 billion light years in diameter and that it is nearly 13 billion years old would go to show that there has been enough time for other life to develop intelligently and become advanced enough to hike over to us.
"Fermi realized that any civilization with a modest amount of rocket technology and an immodest amount of imperial incentive could rapidly colonize the entire Galaxy. Within ten million years, every star system could be brought under the wing of empire. Ten million years may sound long, but in fact it's quite short compared with the age of the Galaxy, which is roughly ten thousand million years. Colonization of the Milky Way should be a quick exercise."
However, the numbers do not favour us in the slightest. The calculations say that for every star in the observable universe, there are an equal number of galaxies out there. Let that sink in for a second. So, as many stars as there are in the Milky Way Galaxy alone (100 to 400 billion), there are an equal number of galaxies in the Universe.

It also states that for every grain of sand in the world, there are 10,0000 stars.

There are two parallel debates in the science world about the Fermi Paradox. One revolves around how many 'Sun-like' stars there are (in terms of luminosity, size and temperature), and the second debates about how many of those stars have an Earth like planet orbiting them(in terms of liquid water and the ability to sustain life like on Earth). Even if we consider the lowest of estimates, which says that 1% of planets orbiting stars in the Universe are Earth like, that number still means that there are approximately 100 billion billion Earth like planets.


So, for every grain of sand on Earth, there are about 100 Earth-like planets out there. Think about that the next time you're on the beach.  

The Fermi Paradox has been critically acclaimed by many renowned scientists and the general scientifically literate population for its strong argument. It gets more and more speculative, though.

"Let’s imagine that after billions of years in existence, 1% of Earth-like planets develop life (if that’s true, every grain of sand would represent one planet with life on it). And imagine that on 1% of those planets, the life advances to an intelligent level like it did here on Earth. That would mean there were 10 quadrillion, or 10 million billion intelligent civilizations in the observable universe.
Moving back to just our galaxy, and doing the same math on the lowest estimate for stars in the Milky Way (100 billion), we’d estimate that there are 1 billion Earth-like planets and 100,000 intelligent civilizations in our galaxy." - Derived from the Drake equation.
This red circle consists of every single star that we can see in the night sky.

'The Great Filter'

The Great Filter

The Great Filter is perhaps the most logical and valid explanation to solve the Fermi Paradox. The Great Filter has one of two possibilities. It says that in the process of evolving from a bare, lifeless planet to a galaxy fairing civilisation, there is a step/obstacle that most civilisations fall short of.

The first possibility is that we, sometime in our evolution passed that obstacle and we are one of the rare civilisations to ever do so. That's good news: it means we're one of the first or one of the very few species that will reach this level of technology.

The second possibility is that the obstacle hasn't been reached yet, and that it is ahead of us. That's bad news, because it means there is some danger, likely completely unknown to us, that can wipe us out in a way that is very difficult or impossible to avoid. It would mean that, for example, we should be extremely careful with certain kinds of scientific experimentation that we do not fully understand.

We don't know which two of the possibilities is the one we will face.

While it's generally good to be optimistic, it may be more advantageous to lean towards believing that the Great Filter lies ahead of us. Apophenia, the human tendency to recognise patterns from random data helps us because species with a healthy, higher sense of apophenia tend to protect themselves, reproduce and become the norm, as Michael Stevens says:
"If there's ambiguity to whether that thing in the shadows is a threat or just a shadow, it's advantageous to air on the side of threat."
Being cautious about our progress as a species will make us more careful, and less likely to fall short of the great filter, if it is in fact, ahead of us. While of course, the Fermi Paradox is at its core only a theory. We can't say with any certainty if whether we will hit the Great Filter in a million years, or tomorrow night.


We may have been born too early to explore the cosmos and too late to explore the Earth, but our lives on this blue marble will still not be wasted. Nowhere in a quintillion planets in our universe will there be someone just like you. That means something special. Make the most of the time you have here.
"There is good out there in the universe that has your name on it. Nobody can get your good." - Les Brown
As always, thanks for reading.


Sources


Comments

  1. Very fascinating blog. Came accross this page on reddit. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a great read! Very well put together. I write extensively about the Fermi Paradox (which interestingly really isn't a paradox, and wasn't by Fermi), and The Great Filter, in my book: www.ourcosmicstory.com.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very interested in reading your book! Will order it shortly :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding extremist terrorism

While I hate to talk about such a grim, dark topic, terrorism is running rampant across the globe, and there just seems to be no end. In 2017, the face of terrorism are organisations like ISIS. So, what exactly is terrorism? Merriam-Webster calls terrorism "the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal."

Let's face it, terrorism isn't new. It's been around for a long time. The word, in fact, dates back to the late 18th century around the time of the French revolution. So why is it such a big deal now?

Because now terrorist organisations aren't local. They are getting more radical, and they don't just have political agendas. They've become irrational, crazed with the idea of securing the world under their woeful grasp.


To understand terrorism, it's essential to understand where it begins. All terrorist activities are motivated by one or two things, social/political injustice or the idea th…

The Psychology of External Validation

A recent conversation intrigued me to explore this topic, and I find it perhaps one of the most relevant ones I have written about. So, here goes.

I've known people who always get hundreds of likes on their posts hours within posting them. I have never been one of these people. I've never received many likes or shares, and when I was in my younger years, it was hurtful, in a way. I used to see my posts and shares sit on my wall for days with only a few likes, and back then, it was painful for me, so to say. It made me doubt my worthiness, and created a feeling that no one cared about what I had to say. I used to post a lot on Facebook just to see how many likes/shares/comments would accumulate in a few hours. I would be disheartened when that number didn't live upto my expectations. I'm sure some of you have had this feeling, and it's okay.

Why? Why, just why is it like this? Why do we doubt our worth, why do we feel so bad just because someone didn't press or…