Skip to main content

The Science of Dark Humour | Hri-write

I'd like to begin by saying this blog isn't meant to offend anyone. It's all for the sake of fun and entertainment, and to satisfy my sadistic desideratum. If you're easily offended, or if this blog offended you in any way, it's because it was meant to.

(If that last line offended you, get out right now. It's going to get much worse.)

It might be worthwhile to address the question of 'why we laugh' before dealing with comedy styles such as dark humour.
We believe laughter evolved from the panting behavior of our ancient primate ancestors. Today, if we tickle chimps or gorillas, they don’t laugh “ha ha ha” but exhibit a panting sound. That’s the sound of ape laughter. And it’s the root of human laughter. Apes laugh in conditions in which human laughter is produced, like tickle, rough and tumble play, and chasing games. Other animals produce vocalizations during play, but they are so different that it’s difficult to equate them with laughter. Rats, for e…

Why doesn't anybody talk about the ISRO?

Mangalyaan. It's a word you've probably heard a lot the last few years. That's because it was one of the world's cheapest space probes to reach Mars, collect data and relay it back to Earth, even more efficiently than NASA.

Who was the genius space institute who developed this?
None other than India's ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization).
Why didn't we hear about it as much? Because the ISRO isn't NASA. Or so we think.

On a budget nearly 9 to 10 times tighter than granted to NASA, the ISRO launched the Mars Orbiter Mission to Mars orbit in late 2014. With this, India became the first nation to complete the mission in its first try, and only the fourth one to venture to Mars.

Remember back when water was discovered that there was water on the moon? Who contributed to that astonishing revelation? Chandrayaan-1, India's first lunar mission. Why did NASA take credit? Technically, it was their gadget aboard the mission that picked up the data...

I think you get the idea. On such a small budget and time period, we've done more than what most countries have achieved in the lifetimes of their space programs.

Take these missions for example:

PSLV, June 2016: Developed and operated by the ISRO, it broke the ISRO's own record of the multiple satellites that could be launched at the same time. ISRO broke its own record by launching 20 satellites in one mission. The PSLV carried a weight of 1,288 kilograms, with India’s Cartosat-2 series satellite (725.5 kg) taking up most it. The Cartosat satellite aims at charting urban, rural, coastal land use, and water distribution among others. [2]

IRNSS-1G, April 2016: Prior to the PSLV mission, the IRNSS-1G mission was the titleholder for ISRO's record. It launched seven satellites that aim to make India self-reliant on GPS technology. The navigation satellites aim at making India self-sufficient with an indigenous navigation system. The satellites will provide real-time positioning and timing services. Its services will be extended to regions 1,500 km around India. IRNSS satellite constellation consists of three satellites in GEO orbit and four satellites in GSO orbit. [2]

What a tragedy it is that they're so underfunded. Like NASA.

You probably read that last sentence with a face similar to the one I have throughout the entire duration of a physics test. (Yes, I am subpar at physics. Deal with it.) After the famed moon missions and the space race with the Soviets, the American masses lost interest in their space program, and even though they try to cover it up, there's a lot of mishaps even at NASA. The government went on cutting the funding to the NASA program, forcing them to shut down so many facilities across the US.

Why is space travel still flourishing in the United States? The genius of capitalism.

Why privatized space corporations could revive the Indian space industry:

You've probably heard about this up-and-coming small company called SpaceX? Okay, who am I kidding? SpaceX is huge. SpaceX now receives contracts from NASA to resupply the international space station. That's not something the average Joe gets to do.

The difference between the once dominant NASA and the behemoth that SpaceX is becoming? SpaceX is funded privately and is the brainchild of a man called Elon Musk. At this point, if you haven't heard about Elon Musk, I can recommend a good mental asylum.

The problem with government programs is that they are never guaranteed. Politics plays an important part; whether the party in power is in favor of funding the department or not, whether the public supports the movement etc. However, privately funded organizations streamline the process, from foreign investments to not needing bills to be passed in government to authorize the program. SpaceX is a prime example.

The secondary major benefit is competitiveness. Seeing one private space organization doing well will tempt other billionaires to give rise to their own corporations, and then they will all compete to build the most effective satellites and shuttles. In turn, this definitely means the entire industry benefits as top players are locked into researching technology before each other, and improves our understanding. We've seen this in India; the internet/telecom industry has benefited so much from companies like Vodafone/Airtel/Reliance competing to develop and introduce the best technologies, which in turn improved the nation's infrastructure and logistics as a whole.

So, what's the main takeaway? There's an unfathomable amount of potential to be tapped into by private corporations if they choose to do so, which in turn will bring back so many intelligent people we lose to other nations and employment will definitely see a rise. With the advent of Mr Modi's Make In India campaign and foreign funding, this could be the perfect time for this...

Who knows? We could be the leaders of the space race soon enough.

References/Interesting reads





Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Where is all the 'alien life?' - Fermi Paradox and other theories

My first blog, ever, was about understanding the odds of alien life. I've gotten much better at writing blogs since then (or so I like to tell myself), and it would only be right if I reinstate the legacy of that one.

We should openly admit that when we happen to be under a starry night and see a sight similar to this, we all have a react in a different and interesting way. Some people are left boggled by the immense size of the universe, others by the sheer glamour of the scene and if you're anything like me, you're paralysed by the sudden realisation that you have a negligible impact on the universe. The point is, we all feel something.

When he looked up at the sky, Italian physicist Enrico Fermi too felt something, a thought that lingered around this question, "Where is everyone else?" It's been half a decade since Fermi passed on, but he left us with a fundamental query and idea.

Fermi realised that in a universe as old and vast as this, there should be…

Understanding extremist terrorism

While I hate to talk about such a grim, dark topic, terrorism is running rampant across the globe, and there just seems to be no end. In 2017, the face of terrorism are organisations like ISIS. So, what exactly is terrorism? Merriam-Webster calls terrorism "the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal."

Let's face it, terrorism isn't new. It's been around for a long time. The word, in fact, dates back to the late 18th century around the time of the French revolution. So why is it such a big deal now?

Because now terrorist organisations aren't local. They are getting more radical, and they don't just have political agendas. They've become irrational, crazed with the idea of securing the world under their woeful grasp.

To understand terrorism, it's essential to understand where it begins. All terrorist activities are motivated by one or two things, social/political injustice or the idea th…

The Psychology of External Validation

A recent conversation intrigued me to explore this topic, and I find it perhaps one of the most relevant ones I have written about. So, here goes.

I've known people who always get hundreds of likes on their posts hours within posting them. I have never been one of these people. I've never received many likes or shares, and when I was in my younger years, it was hurtful, in a way. I used to see my posts and shares sit on my wall for days with only a few likes, and back then, it was painful for me, so to say. It made me doubt my worthiness, and created a feeling that no one cared about what I had to say. I used to post a lot on Facebook just to see how many likes/shares/comments would accumulate in a few hours. I would be disheartened when that number didn't live upto my expectations. I'm sure some of you have had this feeling, and it's okay.

Why? Why, just why is it like this? Why do we doubt our worth, why do we feel so bad just because someone didn't press or…